Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA
  • Home
    • About Us >
      • About Us
      • Events
      • SJP Alumni
      • FAQ
    • Get Involved >
      • Get Involved
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
  • Divest
    • Fall 2014 Divestment Campaign
    • Endorsements
    • Endorse the Divestment Campaign
    • Divestment Feedback
    • Winter 2014 (Last Year) Divestment Campaign
  • News & Opinion
  • Issues
    • Judicial Board Case Summary
    • Resolving to Divest
  • Resources
    • Fact Sheets & Handouts
    • Books
    • Documentaries & Films
    • Helpful Websites
  • Multimedia
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Alex Odeh Library
  • Board
  • PAW
  • T-Shirts
  • Home
    • About Us >
      • About Us
      • Events
      • SJP Alumni
      • FAQ
    • Get Involved >
      • Get Involved
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
  • Divest
    • Fall 2014 Divestment Campaign
    • Endorsements
    • Endorse the Divestment Campaign
    • Divestment Feedback
    • Winter 2014 (Last Year) Divestment Campaign
  • News & Opinion
  • Issues
    • Judicial Board Case Summary
    • Resolving to Divest
  • Resources
    • Fact Sheets & Handouts
    • Books
    • Documentaries & Films
    • Helpful Websites
  • Multimedia
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Alex Odeh Library
  • Board
  • PAW
  • T-Shirts

On Divestment and “True” Justice

1/24/2014

 
By Omar Zahzah, UCLA SJP

In 2005 Palestinian Civil Society issued the call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, and subsequently chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine in college campuses across the U.S. took it upon themselves to honor this call to action by attempting to get their schools either to boycott or divest from—that is, stop investing in—companies that profit directly from committing human rights violations against Palestinians. Despite the BDS movement’s explicitly non-violent and humanitarian agenda, there have been various objections raised against campus divestment efforts. One such counterargument is that student activists working for this cause aren’t dedicated to “true” justice, because if they were, they would be also be concerned with, say, the unequal treatment of women in Saudi Arabia or injustices faced by Palestinians within other Arab countries. There are, of course, many more issues that could be listed, and that’s precisely the point—the issues usually brought up in these arguments are variables; what remains constant is the underlying implication—namely, that pro-divestment students are somehow “inauthentic” when claiming that they’re working for justice because they only focus on one specific issue.

There are several problems with this argument. Firstly, as Omar Barghouti, Palestinian scholar, choreographer and activist, remarked during an event last Wednesday, divestment is not a zero-sum game. There are many BDS activists involved in multiple causes. Indeed, much of the work done by our SJP chapter is outreaching to and collaborating with a diverse array of other student organizations dedicated to ending the unequal treatment of systematically marginalized groups.

Furthermore, as figures like Cory Robin have argued, it is ridiculous to fault activist efforts for being specific. Throughout history, necessary changes have been brought about precisely by reformers who identified clear, articulable, and achievable goals related to a wider issue, goals which were then pursued via carefully organized campaigns. So, for instance, the unequal treatment of people of color within the U.S., while viewed as a larger concern, has been and continues to be countered through organizing efforts tied to particular aspects of discrimination, such as full and equal access to resources, voting rights, etc. The list goes on and on, and divestment, which would ensure that our school no longer invests in companies that directly profit from systematic abuse of Palestinians, is no different. The point is, although they ultimately work toward a wider goal, the efforts of activists are always specific, and so to cite this as a defect demonstrates a clear misunderstanding of activism and even historical progression overall.  

But for me, one of the chief issues of this argument is its racist and reductive logic. Let me illustrate by example: if I were to tell someone who is active in campaigns related to the femicides in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico that they are not dedicated to “true” justice because their efforts don’t include the treatment of women in other Latin American countries, I would basically be implying that all Latin American countries are “the same” by virtue of being close to one another and sharing a common language. Of course this is not true; despite our awareness of what some countries have in common, we can’t use these similarities as an excuse to over-generalize to the point that we forget how each country is still unique and comes with its own particular set of problems and complications.  This is just as true for the Near East as it is for Latin America, and yet opponents of BDS continue to issue this very charge against Palestine solidarity activists.

Martin Luther King, Jr. once said that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Divestment may only be one cause, and it’s true that it won’t solve everything, even for the Palestinians. But as Dr. King’s quote makes clear, bringing an end to any instance of oppression only brings us closer to a more humane and equal world. If that’s not true justice, I don’t know what is. 


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    May 2017
    March 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    February 2009

    Categories

    All
    5 Broken Cameras
    ACLJ
    Adl
    Administration
    Afrikan Student Union
    Aipac
    Ajc
    Alumni
    Amcha
    Apartheid
    Armenian Student Association
    Awareness
    Bds
    Blumenfield
    Brufem
    Bruin
    Bruins For Israel
    Bruins United
    Burnat
    California Scholars For Academic Freedom
    Campus Climate
    Case Study
    Censorship
    Chican@
    Civility
    Cnes
    Common Struggles
    Conflict Of Interest
    Daily Bruin
    David Horowitz
    Dialogue
    Diversity Requirement
    Divest
    Divestment
    Ethical Investment
    Ethics Statement
    Feminist
    Free Speech
    Gaza
    GSA
    Hewlett Packard
    Hr 35
    Human Rights
    Incarcerated Youth Tutorial Project
    Indus
    Interfaith
    Invented People
    Investment
    Iranian
    Irvine 11
    Irvine Divest
    Islamophobia
    Israeli
    Israeli And Jewish Students
    Jewish
    Jewish Voice For Peace
    Judicial Board
    La City Council
    Makdisi
    Mecha
    MESA
    Milstein
    Muslim Students Association
    Myth
    Nakba
    Normalization
    Northeastern
    Olive Tree Initiative
    One State
    Operation Cast Lead
    Operation Pillar Of Cloud
    Oti
    Palestine
    Palestine Awareness Week
    Palestinian
    Paw
    Positive Investment
    Progressive
    Racism
    Resolution
    Sjp
    Solidarity
    South Africa
    South Asian
    Student
    Student Government
    Timeline
    Two States
    Uc
    Ucla
    United Arab Society
    Usac
    Walkout
    Wall
    Women
    Year In Review

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.